This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

How to Conclude the Doha Development Agenda

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Christian Häberli
Abstract

summaryHow to Conclude the Doha Development AgendaIt is easier to launch a Round than to conclude it, and nice words won't do now. To save a trade negotiation which had already gotten off to a wrong start, and which has turned into a narrow lane focused on agriculture, is especially difficult when world trade is booming and only a few players can see benefits for themselves. Both a 'quick fix' and a 'beef round' are still possible, even though ambitious free-traders will regret such an outcome. A drawn-out pause, on the other hand, is a more likely yet not dramatic scenario. It could even be beneficial. Firstly, for re-tabling the so-called Singapore issues (investment, competition, government procurement). Secondly for reflecting on other issues with increasing importance: new multilateral rules for production and processing methods and, more broadly, tackling societal values through trade-friendly methods such as labelling and international environmental and labour standards. Developing countries rightly fear a new face of protectionism behind such themes. But only a broad menu can lead to generally acceptable results. If it includes new issues the WTO can regain the lead in trade liberalisation. If it continues to ignore societal values, the multilateral trading system might be doomed. Copyright The Agricultural Ecomomics Society and the European Association of Agricultural Economists 2007.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1746-692X.2007.00062.x
File Format: text/html
File Function: link to full text
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by The Agricultural Economics Society and the European Association of Agricultural Economists in its journal EuroChoices.

Volume (Year): 6 (2007)
Issue (Month): 2 (08)
Pages: 36-41
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:6:y:2007:i:2:p:36-41

Contact details of provider:
Email:
Web page: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1478-0917
More information through EDIRC

Order Information:
Web: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/subs.asp?ref=1478-0917

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You too can volunteer for RePEc, for example by editing a NEP report.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-15.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.