IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecorec/v56y1980i152p82-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On a Neo‐Classical Analysis of the Keynesian Income Distribution Theory

Author

Listed:
  • N. F. LAING

Abstract

The Keynesian element of Kaldor's distribution theory was that ‘investment is determined independetly of current savings’. It is argued here that this propsition is true of neo‐classical economic analysis which takes any account of expectations. The Kaldorian mechanism. therefore, also operates in this class of models. This is illustrated by showing the effect in a neo‐classical model of an improvement in investment opportunities in redistributing income from low to high savers. It is argued inter alia (a) that there is no question of a need to reconcile neo‐classical and neo‐Keynesian income distribution theories(b) that the neo‐classical analysis put forward is essentially ex post and therefore serves to isolate mechanism and make relative predictions.

Suggested Citation

  • N. F. Laing, 1980. "On a Neo‐Classical Analysis of the Keynesian Income Distribution Theory," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 56(152), pages 82-86, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:56:y:1980:i:152:p:82-86
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4932.1980.tb01653.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1980.tb01653.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1980.tb01653.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laing, N F, 1969. "Two Notes on Pasinetti's Theorem," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 45(111), pages 373-385, September.
    2. N. F. Laing, 1969. "Two Notes on Pasinetti's Theorem," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 45(3), pages 373-385, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefan Ederer & Miriam Rehm, 2021. "Wealth inequality and aggregate demand," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(2), pages 405-424, May.
    2. Giuseppe Ciccarone, 2004. "Finance and the Cambridge equation," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 163-177.
    3. Luca Zamparelli, 2017. "Wealth Distribution, Elasticity of Substitution and Piketty: An ‘Anti-Dual’ Pasinetti Economy," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(4), pages 927-946, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:56:y:1980:i:152:p:82-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esausea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.