If buyers cannot observe product characteristics, they search available sellers to find better matches. In this situation, market go-betweens who 'manage' a variety of products emerge, offering consumers a variety of trading opportunities which reduce the uncertainty of search and improve the quality of consumer-producer trades. The distribution of the benefits from this intermediation depend critically on the number of products available. When variety is low, increases in capacity heighten competition, thereby lowering prices. On the other hand, with many products on offer, retail firms act monopolistically. In this case, increased capacity raises prices. Copyright (c) The London School of Economics and Political Science 2004.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Publisher Info
Article provided by London School of Economics and Political Science in its journal Economica.
Volume (Year): 71 (2004) Issue (Month): 284 (November) Pages: 619-636 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Related research
Keywords:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Adrian Masters, 2007.
"Middlemen In Search Equilibrium,"
International Economic Review,
Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 48(1), pages 343-362, 02.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)