In the context of a segmented economy in which the urban unemployed subsist in informal-sector activities, Earl Grinols (1991) has recently questioned conventional wisdom whereby foreign investme nt with repatriated earnings is necessarily immiserizing for the host country. In this paper, the authors extend Grinols's analysis and pl ace it in a broader context, permitting richer conceptions of informal-sector activities. Their principal finding is that the original insight is surprisingly robust once Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson factor intensities are suitably modified and interpreted. The authors' models may also have independent inter est for other work on the informal sector. Copyright 1993 by The London School of Economics and Political Science.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Publisher Info
Article provided by London School of Economics and Political Science in its journal Economica.
Volume (Year): 60 (1993) Issue (Month): 237 (February) Pages: 79-103 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML,
plain text,
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote),
ReDIF
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Related research
Keywords:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)