This paper provides an economic rationale for the cross-autocorrelation patterns in stock returns in the context of a microstructure model in which investors have incomplete information. The paper shows that in a market in which investors are informed about only a sub-set of stocks, the emergence of lead-lag, cross-autocorrelations is a function of the cost of trading in other stocks based on information about the sub-set of stocks. If cross-trading costs are high, informed investors will trade only in the sub-set of stocks they are informed about; if cross-trading costs are moderate, informed investors will randomize between trading and not trading in other stocks; and if cross-trading costs are low, they will trade in all stocks. When informed investors trade only in a sub-set of stocks, prices of stocks with more informed trading will adjust to common factor information faster than the prices of stocks with less informed trading giving rise to asymmetric lead-lag cross-autocorrelations. When informed investors trade in all stocks, asymmetric lead-lag cross-autocorrelations will disappear as a result of their cross-market arbitrage trading. These results provide a number of testable implications for lead-lag cross-autocorrelation patterns. The data is consistent with the empirical predictions. Copyright Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, 2004
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Publisher Info
Article provided by Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA in its journal Economic Notes.