IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecaffa/v30y2010i1p33-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Knowledge Inheritance Theory Of Distributive Justice

Author

Listed:
  • Elaine Sternberg

Abstract

This article criticises the ‘knowledge inheritance theory of distributive justice’ presented by Gar Alperovitz and Lew Daly in their Unjust Deserts: How the Rich Are Taking Our Common Inheritance and Why We Should Take It Back; Wealth and Inequality in the Knowledge Economy (New York: The New Press, 2008). The authors claim that since innovation depends far more on accumulated knowledge than on any individual's contribution, most resulting wealth is deserved equally by all members of society. Their redistributive conclusion is not justified. Illegitimately applying the concept of justice to contexts where it is at best metaphorical, the ‘knowledge inheritance theory’ massively undervalues the role of individual intellectual activity, and relies on confusions concerning the nature of society, rights, causality, and gifts.

Suggested Citation

  • Elaine Sternberg, 2010. "The Knowledge Inheritance Theory Of Distributive Justice," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 33-37, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecaffa:v:30:y:2010:i:1:p:33-37
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0270.2009.01970.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0270.2009.01970.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-0270.2009.01970.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecaffa:v:30:y:2010:i:1:p:33-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0265-0665 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.