IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecaffa/v27y2007i3p81-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenging The Challengers: A Review Of Serena Olsaretti'S Liberty, Desert And The Market And Daniel Attas'S Liberty, Property And Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Elaine Sternberg

Abstract

These books attack free markets and libertarianism, alleging that their fundamental assumptions are philosophically indefensible. Olsaretti challenges the thesis that free markets produce distributively just outcomes. At most, however, she shows that limited, desert‐based justifications of free‐market outcomes fail to satisfy her questionable desiderata, and that particular entitlement‐based justifications are inadequately supported when they confound voluntariness and freedom. Attas challenges libertarianism itself, claiming that it is fundamentally wrong, and that libertarian notions of property rights are unsustainable. But he considers only arguments based on defective notions of self‐ownership and confused notions of freedom; other, more robust justifications of liberty and property are ignored. Though both of these books fail to demonstrate the strong conclusions they assert, they highlight the dangers of substituting polemic for philosophy. Free markets, property and liberty need, and deserve, rigorous philosophical defences.

Suggested Citation

  • Elaine Sternberg, 2007. "Challenging The Challengers: A Review Of Serena Olsaretti'S Liberty, Desert And The Market And Daniel Attas'S Liberty, Property And Markets," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 81-86, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecaffa:v:27:y:2007:i:3:p:81-86
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0270.2007.00760.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0270.2007.00760.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-0270.2007.00760.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecaffa:v:27:y:2007:i:3:p:81-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0265-0665 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.