IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/corgov/v9y2001i2p101-109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generally Accepted Management Principles (GAMP) – functions, first proposals, and acceptance among German top managers

Author

Listed:
  • Axel V. Werder
  • Jens Grundei

Abstract

Judging the quality of top management is a pivotal aspect of good corporate governance. Such an evaluation requires standards which can be applied to the work of top management. In the German stock corporation this is particularly important for the Supervisory Board (Aufsichtsrat), because its main task is to control the quality of the Management Board (Vorstand). The development of generally accepted management principles seems to be a promising attempt to facilitate a fair management evaluation. These management principles are supposed to put in concrete form the top management’s duties of care. They thus can help to assure a certain management quality as well as to protect managers against exaggerated demands. After elaborating on these basic thoughts, a system of standards is outlined and the results from a first survey investigating the acceptance of the proposed standards among German top managers are reported.

Suggested Citation

  • Axel V. Werder & Jens Grundei, 2001. "Generally Accepted Management Principles (GAMP) – functions, first proposals, and acceptance among German top managers," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(2), pages 101-109, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:corgov:v:9:y:2001:i:2:p:101-109
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-8683.00234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00234
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-8683.00234?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:corgov:v:9:y:2001:i:2:p:101-109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0964-8410&site=1 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.