IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/annpce/v86y2015i2p245-266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Market Share of Nonprofit and For-profit Organizations in the Quasi-Market: Japan's Long-Term Care Services Market

Author

Listed:
  • Nobuko KANAYA
  • Hiromasa TAKAHASHI
  • Junyi SHEN

Abstract

This study uses a prefectural panel data set to examine the factors that affect the market share of nonprofit and for-profit providers in Japan's long-term care insurance system. Here, we focus on the market size and potential, asymmetric information, and the voluntarism environment. Our findings are as follows: (1) nonprofit organizations have a larger market share in areas with relatively unprofitable market conditions; (2) in the case of asymmetric information, experienced nonprofit providers, including government-driven and partial nonprofit providers, have a larger market share than citizen-driven nonprofit and for-profit providers; and (3) citizen-driven nonprofit providers have a larger market share in areas with more active civic voluntarism.

Suggested Citation

  • Nobuko KANAYA & Hiromasa TAKAHASHI & Junyi SHEN, 2015. "The Market Share of Nonprofit and For-profit Organizations in the Quasi-Market: Japan's Long-Term Care Services Market," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 86(2), pages 245-266, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:86:y:2015:i:2:p:245-266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/apce.12077
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Avner BEN-NER & Theresa VAN HOOMISSEN, 1991. "Nonprofit Organizations In The Mixed Economy," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 519-550, October.
    2. Gulley, O. David & Santerre, Rexford E., 1993. "The Effect of Tax Exemption on the Market Share of Nonprofit Hospitals," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 46(4), pages 477-486, December.
    3. Gulley, O. David & Santerre, Rexford E., 1993. "The Effect of Tax Exemption on the Market Share of Nonprofit Hospitals," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 46(4), pages 477-86, December.
    4. Le Grand, Julian, 2003. "Motivation, Agency, and Public Policy: Of Knights and Knaves, Pawns and Queens," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199266999.
    5. Ben-Ner Avner & Karaca-Mandic Pinar & Ren Ting, 2012. "Ownership and Quality in Markets with Asymmetric Information: Evidence from Nursing Homes," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-33, October.
    6. Avner BEN-NER & Theresa HOOMISSEN, 1992. "An Empirical Investigation Of The Joint Determination Of The Size Of The For-Profit, Nonprofit And Government Sectors," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(3), pages 391-415, July.
    7. Jerald SCHIFF & Burton WEISBROD, 1991. "Competition Between For-Profit And Nonprofit Organizations In Commercial Markets," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 619-640, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kraus, Margit & Stegarescu, Dan, 2005. "Non-Profit-Organisationen in Deutschland: Ansatzpunkte für eine Refom des Wohlfahrtsstaats," ZEW Dokumentationen 05-02, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    2. Junyi Shen & Nobuko Kanaya & Hiromasa Takahashi, 2014. "The Share of Nonprofit and For-profit Organizations in the Quasi-market: An Analysis of the Long-term Care Services Market in Japan," Discussion Paper Series DP2014-08, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    3. James Alm & Daniel Teles, 2018. "State and federal tax policy toward nonprofit organizations," Chapters, in: Bruce A. Seaman & Dennis R. Young (ed.), Handbook of Research on Nonprofit Economics and Management, chapter 19, pages 370-385, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Josphat Nyoni & Tendai Vanesssa Jaravaza & Matthew Mare & Martin Dandira & Elias Kandjinga, 2021. "Policy Contradictions and Policy Dilemma: A Case of Intermediary Money Transfer Tax (IMTT) on Business Performance in the Engineering Sector in Zimbabwe," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(2), pages 76-89, June.
    5. Ben-Ner Avner & Karaca-Mandic Pinar & Ren Ting, 2012. "Ownership and Quality in Markets with Asymmetric Information: Evidence from Nursing Homes," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-33, October.
    6. Jérǒme BALLET, 1994. "L'Entreprise À Vocation Sociale," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(4), pages 623-640, October.
    7. William M. Gentry & John Penrod, 2000. "The Tax Benefits of Not-for-Profit Hospitals," NBER Chapters, in: The Changing Hospital Industry: Comparing Not-for-Profit and For-Profit Institutions, pages 285-324, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Lakdawalla, Darius & Philipson, Tomas, 2006. "The nonprofit sector and industry performance," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(8-9), pages 1681-1698, September.
    9. Leonardo Becchetti & Benjamin Huybrechts, 2008. "The Dynamics of Fair Trade as a Mixed-form Market," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(4), pages 733-750, September.
    10. Anup Malani & Tomas Philipson & Guy David, 2003. "Theories of Firm Behavior in the Nonprofit Sector. A Synthesis and Empirical Evaluation," NBER Chapters, in: The Governance of Not-for-Profit Organizations, pages 181-216, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Teresa D. Harrison, 2008. "Taxes and Agglomeration Economies: How Are They Related to Nonprofit Firm Location?," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 75(2), pages 538-557, August.
    12. O. David Gulley & Rexford E. Santerre, 2003. "The Effect of Public Policies on Nursing Home Care in the United States," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 29(1), pages 93-104, Winter.
    13. repec:bla:annpce:v:89:y:2018:i:1:p:109-124 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Lamboy-Ruiz, Melvin A. & Lien, Donald & Smith, Pamela C., 2021. "Nonprofit classification decisions in response to threshold-based charity care incentives," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    15. Harrison, Teresa & Seim, Katja, 2013. "Nonprofit tax exemptions and market structure: The case of fitness centers," School of Economics Working Paper Series 2013-4, LeBow College of Business, Drexel University.
    16. Josse Delfgaauw & Robert Dur, 2008. "Incentives and Workers' Motivation in the Public Sector," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 118(525), pages 171-191, January.
    17. Luciano Fanti & Domenico Buccella, 2017. "Corporate social responsibility in a game-theoretic context," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 44(3), pages 371-390, September.
    18. Erwan Quéinnec, 2012. "Les organisations sans but lucratif repondent- elles à une demande de biens de confiance ? Le cas des services de prise en charge," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 122(1), pages 67-87.
    19. Bruno S. Frey & Alois Stutzer, 2006. "Environmental Morale and Motivation," CREMA Working Paper Series 2006-17, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    20. Dolfsma, W.A., 2006. "IPRs, Technological Development, and Economic Development," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2006-004-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    21. Carlo Borzaga & Silvia Sacchetti, 2015. "Why Social Enterprises Are Asking to Be Multi-stakeholder and Deliberative: An Explanation around the Costs of Exclusion," Euricse Working Papers 1575, Euricse (European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:86:y:2015:i:2:p:245-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1370-4788 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.