IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/acctfi/v44y2004i3p329-356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technological and organizational influences on the adoption of activity‐based costing in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • David A. Brown
  • Peter Booth
  • Francesco Giacobbe

Abstract

The present paper examines one set of potential reasons for the paradox as to why so few firms have adopted activity‐based costing (ABC) despite the demonstrated benefits of this costing system. A cross‐sectional survey of Australian firms is used to examine the influence of seven technological and organizational factors on firms’ initial interest in ABC and their decision to adopt it or not. The organizational factors of top management support, the support of an internal champion, and organizational size were shown to be associated with initial interest in ABC. The decision to adopt or reject ABC had one organizational factor associated with it, the support of an internal champion.

Suggested Citation

  • David A. Brown & Peter Booth & Francesco Giacobbe, 2004. "Technological and organizational influences on the adoption of activity‐based costing in Australia," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 44(3), pages 329-356, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:44:y:2004:i:3:p:329-356
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-629x.2004.00118.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629x.2004.00118.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-629x.2004.00118.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmed Abdel‐Maksoud & Wagdy Abdallah & Mayada Youssef, 2012. "An empirical study of the influence of intensity of competition on the deployment of contemporary management accounting practices and managerial techniques in Egyptian firms," Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(2), pages 84-97, February.
    2. Jui‐Ling Hsu & Meng‐Cheng Cheng, 2012. "What Prompts Small and Medium Enterprises to Engage in Corporate Social Responsibility? A Study from Taiwan," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(5), pages 288-305, September.
    3. Kevin Baird, 2007. "Adoption of activity management practices in public sector organizations," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 47(4), pages 551-569, December.
    4. Davood Askarany & Hassan Yazdifar, 2018. "The Diffusion of Balanced Scorecard from the Perspective of Adopters: Evidence from Australia," Review of Economics & Finance, Better Advances Press, Canada, vol. 14, pages 71-82, November.
    5. Askarany, Davood & Yazdifar, Hassan & Askary, Saeed, 2010. "Supply chain management, activity-based costing and organisational factors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 238-248, October.
    6. Maiga, Adam S., 2014. "Assessing self-selection and endogeneity issues in the relation between activity-based costing and performance," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 251-262.
    7. Anne Fortin & Hamid Haffaf & Chantal Viger, 2007. "The Measurement of Success of Activity‐Based Costing and Its Determinants: A Study within Canadian Federal Government Organizations/L'évaluation Du Succès De La Comptabilité Par Activités Et Ses Déter," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(3), pages 231-262, August.
    8. Nabil Al-Najjar & Sandeep Baliga & David Besanko, 2005. "The Sunk Cost Bias and Managerial Pricing Practices," Levine's Bibliography 666156000000000496, UCLA Department of Economics.
    9. Sudhashini Nair & Yee Soon Nian, 2017. "Factors Affecting Management Accounting Practices in Malaysia," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(10), pages 177-177, September.
    10. Bhimani, Alnoor & Sivabalan, Prabhu & Soonawalla, Kazbi, 2018. "A study of the linkages between rolling budget forms, uncertainty and strategy," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 306-323.
    11. Nabil Al‐Najjar & Sandeep Baliga & David Besanko, 2008. "Market forces meet behavioral biases: cost misallocation and irrational pricing," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 39(1), pages 214-237, March.
    12. Hadid, Wael & Hamdan, Mohammed, 2022. "Firm size and cost system sophistication: The role of firm age," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(2).
    13. Simon Alcouffe & Jonathan Maurice & Nadine Galy & Loïc Gate, 2019. "Is the limited diffusion of management accounting innovations really a paradox? A meta-analysis of the relationship between product diversity and the adoption of Activity-Based Costing [La faible d," Post-Print hal-02124677, HAL.
    14. Lee, Jessica & Elbashir, Mohamed Z. & Mahama, Habib & Sutton, Steve G., 2014. "Enablers of top management team support for integrated management control systems innovations," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25.
    15. Kevin Baird & Graeme Harrison & Robert Reeve, 2007. "Success of activity management practices: the influence of organizational and cultural factors," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 47(1), pages 47-67, March.
    16. Abedalqader Rbaba’h, 2013. "The influence of Company Characteristics Factors to Activity Based Costing System Implementation," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 4(2), pages 36-46.
    17. David Emsley & Lai Hong Chung, 2010. "How Management Accountants' Cognitive Style and Role Involvement Combine to Affect the Effort Devoted to Initiating Change," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 46(3), pages 232-257, September.
    18. Lino Cinquini & Paolo Collini & Alessandro Marelli & Andrea Tenucci, 2015. "Change in the relevance of cost information and costing systems: evidence from two Italian surveys," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 19(3), pages 557-587, August.
    19. Alcouffe, Simon & Galy, Nadine & Gaté, Loïc, 2016. "Une méta-analyse qualitative de la littérature sur les déterminants de l'adoption de l'activity-based costing [A meta-analysis of the literature on the determinants of the adoption of activity-base," MPRA Paper 73381, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. David Emsley & Barbara Nevicky & Graeme Harrison, 2006. "Effect of cognitive style and professional development on the initiation of radical and non‐radical management accounting innovations," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 46(2), pages 243-264, June.
    21. Mahmoud Nassar & Lina Warrad & Yousef Abu Siam, 2017. "The Implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning System within Jordanian Industrial Sector," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(3), pages 179-187.
    22. Maiga, Adam S. & Nilsson, Anders & Jacobs, Fred A., 2014. "Assessing the interaction effect of cost control systems and information technology integration on manufacturing plant financial performance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 77-90.
    23. Al-Sayed, Mahmoud & Dugdale, David, 2016. "Activity-based innovations in the UK manufacturing sector: Extent, adoption process patterns and contingency factors," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 38-58.
    24. Karim Charaf & Ahmed Fath-Allah Rahmouni, 2014. "Using Importance Performance Analysis to Evaluate the Satisfaction of Activity-Based Costing Adopters," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 13(4), pages 665-685, December.
    25. Askarany, Davood & Yazdifar, Hassan, 2012. "An investigation into the mixed reported adoption rates for ABC: Evidence from Australia, New Zealand and the UK," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 430-439.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:44:y:2004:i:3:p:329-356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaanzea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.