In this paper we pursue an approach based on economic theory to illustrate possible shortcomings of widely used detrending methods. We analyze a simple model of economic growth and business cycles in which investment and technical progress are stochastic. The Hodrick-Prescott and the Baxter-King filter are shown to detect spurious business cycles that are not related to actual cycles in the model. Our results cast doubts on the validity of commonly accepted stylized business cycle facts. We also discuss the relation of business cycle dating based on indicators of economic activity, as applied, for example, by the National Bureau of Economic Research, and the detrending results.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: