This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

What Does HMO Market Share Measure? Examining Provider Choice Restrictions

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Laurence Baker (Stanford University and NBER)
Abstract

Many discussions of managed care, as well as policy making and research efforts, treat managed care with a broad brush, forcing a wide variety of organizations into a single framework that facilitates discussion but abstracts from a number of key issues. Although it may be instructive to conduct broad discussions about managed care, a more detailed understanding of the specific activities that managed care plans undertake and their likely effects is required to support comprehensive policy efforts. Frequently, however, efforts to be more detailed are hampered by shortcomings in the measurement of managed care.This paper lays out a framework of the various activities undertaken by managed care organizations that may be helpful in developing further efforts to understand and measure specific plan activities. The paper also discusses and evaluates some common measures. Detailed data on the exact activities of health insurers and managed care plans are not widely available. One commonly used, but less detailed, measure is the percent of the population enrolled in health maintenance organizations (HMOs). Another places markets on a continuum based on the estimated stage of managed care development in the market. Using data from a new survey, this article compares available measures with more detailed data, suggesting that available data on HMO market share seems to accurately reflect HMO activity, but may not capture the prevalence of some underlying activities of plans like having strong restrictions on enrollee choice of providers, and may also not capture the prevalence of other forms of managed care plans (e.g. Preferred Provider Organizations).These results suggest the importance of distinguishing between the many activities of managed care plans when considering policies that would influence the development of managed care, and when evaluating results from research studies that primarily rely on measures of HMO activity. Results from studies of HMOs may not apply to other types of managed care plans. Policies that target HMOs, or other managed care plans broadly, may be less effective than policies that target specific activities of plans.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1018&context=fhep
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: Subscription to the journal may be required to access full texts.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Berkeley Electronic Press in its journal Forum for Health Economics & Policy.

Volume (Year): 3 (2000)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 1018-1018
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:bep:fhecpo:v:3:y:2000:i:1:p:1018-1018

Note: oai:bepress:fhep-1018
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.bepress.com/fhep

Order Information:
Web: http://www.bepress.com/subscriptions.html

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. David Cutler & Louise Sheiner, 1998. "Managed Care and the Growth of Medical Expenditures," Forum for Health Economics & Policy, Berkeley Electronic Press, vol. 1(1), pages 1058-1058. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? About five million pdf files are downloaded through RePEc every year.

This page was last updated on 2008-11-19.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.