IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bbz/fcpbbr/v5y2008i3p242-257.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic-Financial Profile of Companies Which Do And Don’t Do Assets Reevaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Eliandro Schvirck

    (Technology University of Paraná)

  • Oldair Roberto Giasson

    (Technology University of Paraná)

Abstract

The evaluation of assets through the historical cost presents limitations in its informative power due to the value imbalance, thus the accounting values can be unreal front to the market. An alternative to decrease the impact of the value imbalance on the permanent assets, which are most sensible to this fact, is the evaluation to the current cost. The Brazilian legislation allows to the companies the alternative of assets reevaluation through the value of market, thus, some companies use this procedure and others not. In this context, the present study had as objective to investigate the economic-financial profile of these two groups of companies to verify if significant differences between them exist. We used for this the group of companies which displays its statements in São Paulo Stock Exchange (BOVESPA), totalizing 261 companies. With the intention of evaluating the significance of the existing differences, the non-parametric test of hypotheses Mann Whitney was used. The results point to the existence of significant differences in the profile of the two groups of companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Eliandro Schvirck & Oldair Roberto Giasson, 2008. "Economic-Financial Profile of Companies Which Do And Don’t Do Assets Reevaluation," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 5(3), pages 242-257, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bbz:fcpbbr:v:5:y:2008:i:3:p:242-257
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/download/395/604
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bbz:fcpbbr:v:5:y:2008:i:3:p:242-257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Lasso (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fucapbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.