IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bac/fsecub/13-18-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Overview About Project Quality Management

Author

Listed:
  • Catalin Drob

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to emphasize the main aspects regarding project quality management. This study tries to present in the comparative manner, different approaches of the main guidelines, international standards and methodologies regarding project quality management (the PMBOK ® Guide elaborated by the Project Management Institute, the PRINCE method elaborated by the British Office of Government Commerce etc.). The PMBOK® Guide describes three elements (processes) of quality management: quality planning (plan quality management), quality assurance (perform quality assurance) and quality control (control quality). The PMBOK approach regarding project quality management is that quality management must lead to achieving and validating project requirements. According the PRINCE method the quality is one of the six variables involved in any project. The PRINCE approach regarding project quality management considers that strategy in this field must lead to achieving just the level of quality needed to achieve in the project and not to ensuring the best quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Catalin Drob, 2013. "Overview About Project Quality Management," Studies and Scientific Researches. Economics Edition, "Vasile Alecsandri" University of Bacau, Faculty of Economic Sciences, issue 18.
    • Handle: RePEc:bac:fsecub:13-18-28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://sceco.ub.ro/DATABASE/repec/pdf/2013/20131828.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W. Edwards Deming, 2000. "The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education, 2nd Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262541165, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Su, Hung-Chung & Kao, Ta-Wei (Daniel) & Linderman, Kevin, 2020. "Where in the supply chain network does ISO 9001 improve firm productivity?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(2), pages 530-540.
    2. Lei, Xue & MacKenzie, Cameron A., 2020. "Distinguishing between common cause variation and special cause variation in a manufacturing system: A simulation of decision making for different types of variation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    3. Maynard, A., 2014. "Contracting for Quality in the NHS," Monographs, Office of Health Economics, number 000073.
    4. Mayara Ramos & Fernando A. Forcellini & Marcelo G. G. Ferreira & Simon Bowen & Peter C. Wright, 2022. "Cyclical experience‐based design: A proposal for engaging stakeholders in a co‐creative model for primary health care service design," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 486-503, January.
    5. Pavel Mates & Tomas Lechner & Pavel Rieger & Jitka Pekna, 2013. "Towards e-Government project assessment: European approach," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 31(1), pages 103-125.
    6. Erwin B. Quendangan, DBA & Ferdinand C. Somido, PhD & Susana C. Bautista, EdD & Pedrito Jose V. Bermudo, PhD & Antonio D.Yango, PhD & Leomar S. Galicia, PhD, 2018. "Quality Management System’s (QMS) impact on organizational performance of the college academic deans: a basis for continual improvement," Journal of Business & Management (COES&RJ-JBM), , vol. 6(1), pages 84-97, January.
    7. Anupam Das & Himangshu Paul & Fredric W. Swierczek & Tritos Laosirihongthong, 2006. "A Measurement Instrument For Tqm Implementation In The Thai Manufacturing Industry," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(04), pages 361-377.
    8. Vishal Singh Patyal & K. Maddulety, 2015. "Interrelationship between Total Quality Management and Six Sigma: A Review," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 16(6), pages 1025-1060, December.
    9. Kang Eng Thye, 2014. "A Good Quality Filing System and its Documentation: The Right Information Determined the Right Knowledge for Decision-Making," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 6(5), pages 249-254.
    10. Conan Mukherjee & Ranojoy Basu & Aftab Alam, 2020. "A measure of authorship by publications," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(3), pages 354-361, April.
    11. Pearce, Antony & Pons, Dirk & Neitzert, Thomas, 2018. "Implementing lean—Outcomes from SME case studies," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 94-104.
    12. Kang Eng Thye, 2011. "Quality Research Framework: Enumerative Study Versus Analytic Study from Deming's Perspective," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 3(1), pages 126-131, January.
    13. Seán Paul Teeling & Jan Dewing & Deborah Baldie, 2021. "A Realist Inquiry to Identify the Contribution of Lean Six Sigma to Person-Centred Care and Cultures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-21, October.
    14. Seán Paul Teeling & Jan Dewing & Deborah Baldie, 2022. "Developing New Methods for Person-Centred Approaches to Adjudicate Context–Mechanism–Outcome Configurations in Realist Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-17, February.
    15. Ailish Daly & Sean Paul Teeling & Suzanne Garvey & Marie Ward & Martin McNamara, 2022. "Using a Combined Lean and Person-Centred Approach to Support the Resumption of Routine Hospital Activity following the First Wave of COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-20, February.
    16. Eyvind Aven & Terje Aven, 2015. "On the Need for Rethinking Current Practice that Highlights Goal Achievement Risk in an Enterprise Context," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(9), pages 1706-1716, September.
    17. Terje Aven, 2015. "The Concept of Antifragility and its Implications for the Practice of Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(3), pages 476-483, March.
    18. McGovern, Gerard, 2021. "Capturing community value in civic energy business model design," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    19. Gerald J. Hahn & Necip Doganaksoy, 2009. "Discussion: Fisher–Nair paper," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1), pages 29-32, January.
    20. Ivo De Loo & Otmar Donnenberg & Urs Baldegger & Steve Briault & Ad Krijnen & Rhetta Moran, 2007. "SPECIAL ISSUE: Lean and learning: reshaping working and learning in organizations," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 3-8, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    project management; quality; processes; standards;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bac:fsecub:13-18-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan Nichifor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fseubro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.