IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/alu/journl/v1y2009i11p8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Software: From Product To Service The Evolution Of A Model

Author

Listed:
  • DragoÅŸ Marian Mangiuc

Abstract

Among the consequences of the Enterprise 2.0 family technologies' growing popularity, we can observe the rise of a set of new business models for the use and employment of software applications, some of them also applicable for infrastructure components. The most popular of these models is by far “Software as a Service†(also called SaaS). SaaS is a software distribution model assuming the software applications are hosted and maintained by the vendor or the distributor, the user access being granted exclusively by means of the Internet. The paper at hand is a literature review and also an action research, meant to provide an objective and unbiased comparison of the two major software distribution models, and also to identify the strengths, the weaknesses and the favorite areas of applicability for each model. The paper is a part of a larger research performed by the author in the field of Enterprise 2.0 technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • DragoÅŸ Marian Mangiuc, 2009. "Software: From Product To Service The Evolution Of A Model," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(11), pages 1-8.
    • Handle: RePEc:alu:journl:v:1:y:2009:i:11:p:8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://oeconomica.uab.ro/upload/lucrari/1120091/08.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fan, Ming & Kumar, Subodha & Whinston, Andrew B., 2009. "Short-term and long-term competition between providers of shrink-wrap software and software as a service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 661-671, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Panayides, Michalis & Knight, Vince & Harper, Paul, 2023. "A game theoretic model of the behavioural gaming that takes place at the EMS - ED interface," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1236-1258.
    2. Goode, Sigi & Lin, Chinho & Fernandez, Walter & Jiang, James J., 2014. "Exploring two explanations of loyalty in application service provision," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 649-657.
    3. Yang, Bibo & Ng, C.T., 2010. "Pricing problem in wireless telecommunication product and service bundling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 473-480, November.
    4. Dan Wu & Guofang Nan & Minqiang Li, 2020. "Optimal Piracy Control: Should a Firm Implement Digital Rights Management?," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 947-960, August.
    5. Foubert, Bram & Gijsbrechts, Els, 2010. "Please or Squeeze? Brand performance implications of constrained and unconstrained multi-item promotions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 880-892, May.
    6. Li Chen, 2016. "Selling or Renting: Competition of Electronic Book Retailers," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 6(5), pages 1-2.
    7. Zan Zhang & Guofang Nan & Minqiang Li & Yong Tan, 2022. "Competitive Entry of Information Goods Under Quality Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 2869-2888, April.
    8. Li, Gang & Huang, Feng Feng & Cheng, T.C.E. & Zheng, Quan & Ji, Ping, 2014. "Make-or-buy service capacity decision in a supply chain providing after-sales service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 377-388.
    9. Aaqif Afzaal Abbasi & Hai Jin, 2018. "v-Mapper: An Application-Aware Resource Consolidation Scheme for Cloud Data Centers," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    10. Zan Zhang & Guofang Nan & Yong Tan, 2020. "Cloud Services vs. On-Premises Software: Competition Under Security Risk and Product Customization," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 848-864, September.
    11. Arne Katzmarzik, 2011. "Product Differentiation for Software-as-a-Service Providers," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 3(1), pages 19-31, February.
    12. Mark Bender & Esther Gal‐Or & Tansev Geylani, 2022. "The emergence of streaming and its impact on pricing and product strategies of content providers," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 2148-2171, September.
    13. Yung-Ming Li & Jhih-Hua Jhang-Li & Ting-Kai Hwang & Ping-Wen Chen, 2012. "Analysis of pricing strategies for community-based group buying: The impact of competition and waiting cost," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 633-645, July.
    14. Wang, Yu & Li, Minqiang & Feng, Haiyang & Feng, Nan, 2023. "Which is better for competing firms with quality increasing: behavior-based price discrimination or uniform pricing?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    15. Dan Ma & Abraham Seidmann, 2015. "Analyzing Software as a Service with Per-Transaction Charges," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 360-378, June.
    16. Vincent Cho & Aman Chan, 2015. "An integrative framework of comparing SaaS adoption for core and non-core business operations: An empirical study on Hong Kong industries," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 629-644, June.
    17. Jia, Kunhao & Liao, Xiuwu & Feng, Juan, 2018. "Selling or leasing? Dynamic pricing of software with upgrades," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 1044-1061.
    18. Bodas, Tejas & Manjunath, D., 2019. "Revenue maximization in service systems with heterogeneous customers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 686-698.
    19. Jhih-Hua Jhang-Li & Cheng-Wei Chang, 2017. "Analyzing the operation of cloud supply chain: adoption barriers and business model," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 627-660, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Organizational knowledge; Enterprise 2.0; Software as a Service; Web 2.0; Semantic Web;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alu:journl:v:1:y:2009:i:11:p:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dan-Constantin Danuletiu (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.