Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

From discretion to rules? The fate of budgetary management reforms in Slovakia and Hungary

Contents:

Author Info

  • Dóra Győrffy

    ()
    (Péter Pázmány Catholic University Department of Economics Budapest Hungary)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    The main question of the paper, in the context of European economic governance reforms, is to assess whether strengthening fiscal institutions will resolve the problem of budgetary imbalances in countries prone to the deficit bias. The central argument is that the commitment behind the institutional changes — signaled by the composition of fiscal consolidation and the role of external actors — is critical for the success of reforms. In order to examine this thesis the contrasting experiences of Hungary and Slovakia are analyzed. While both have struggled with fiscal imbalances and eventually introduced far-reaching institutional reforms, these were successful in Slovakia while reversed in Hungary. The major implication of these cases is that changes in fiscal management cannot be treated as mere technicalities and are inseparable from the broader economic policy agenda. In countries where short-term considerations dominate decision-making, rules are implemented only under strong external pressure and are likely to be circumvented.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.akademiai.com/content/a3844n3m1lv71305/fulltext.pdf
    Download Restriction: subscription

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary in its journal Society and Economy.

    Volume (Year): 34 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 4 (December)
    Pages: 581-597

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:aka:soceco:v:34:y:2012:i:4:p:581-597

    Note: An earlier version of this paper was presented at the conference “Exploring experiences – Good governance exchange on the frontiers of Europe” at Central European University, Budapest, April 29, 2011. With the usual caveats I am grateful for insightful comments by László Csaba, Wade Jacoby, Gergő Medve-Bálint and an anonymous reviewer. The writing of this paper was sponsored by the TÁMOP 4.2.1 B-11/2/KMR-2011-0002 grant of the Hungarian government and the European Union.
    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://www.akkrt.hu

    Order Information:
    Postal: Akadémiai Kiadó Zrt., Prielle K. u. 21-35. Budapest, 1117, Hungary
    Email:
    Web: http://www.akademiai.com

    Related research

    Keywords: fiscal rules; deficit bias; institutional reforms; Hungary; Slovakia;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aka:soceco:v:34:y:2012:i:4:p:581-597. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Andrea Pók) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Andrea Pók to update the entry or send us the correct address.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.