IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aic/journl/y2011v58p281-304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Meaning Of Perceived Risk In Purchasing Decisions Of The Polish Customers

Author

Listed:
  • Grzegorz Maciejewski

    (Faculty of Economics University of Economics in Katowice Katowice-Poland)

Abstract

In the article, by means of qualitative and quantitive research methods, the following questions have been answered: What is risk for Polish consumer? Is the consumer aware of a risk of failed purchase? And if so, what types of risks do they perceive? Then finally, which risks are the most important for them? The achieved results show that a poor purchase risk, which accompanies consumers, if perceived, it constitutes an important determinant of the purchasing decision making. Polish consumers are aware of the failed purchase risk connected with their purchasing decisions and they perceive it both as a possibility of loss and as a chance for achieving a better result than ex- pected. From among the researched groups of goods and services, consumers most often perceive the risk of a poor purchase in the situation of buying household appliances and tourist services – the situ- ations of cautious and unusual decision making. Polish consumers perceive various types of risk, the importance of which changes depending on the kind of a purchased product.

Suggested Citation

  • Grzegorz Maciejewski, 2011. "The Meaning Of Perceived Risk In Purchasing Decisions Of The Polish Customers," Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" din Iasi - Stiinte Economice (1954-2015), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 58, pages 281-304, november.
  • Handle: RePEc:aic:journl:y:2011:v:58:p:281-304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.feaa.uaic.ro/anale/resurse/mm8maciejewski.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://anale.feaa.uaic.ro/anale/ro/Arhiva%202011-Maciejewski/405
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan Folkmann Wright, 2019. "Decision-making in Risk Management," Chapters, in: Ali G. Hessami (ed.), Perspectives on Risk, Assessment and Management Paradigms, IntechOpen.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Niyazi Gümüº & Özgür Çark, 2021. "The effect of customers’ attitudes towards chatbots on their experience and behavioral intention in Turkey," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 19(3), pages 420-436.
    2. Grzegorz Maciejewski & Sylwia Mokrysz & Łukasz Wróblewski, 2019. "Segmentation of Coffee Consumers Using Sustainable Values: Cluster Analysis on the Polish Coffee Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Niyazi Gümüº & Özgür Çark, 2021. "The effect of customers’ attitudes towards chatbots on their experience and behavioral intention in Turkey," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 19(3), pages 420-436.
    4. Anetta Barska & Julia Wojciechowska-Solis & Joanna Wyrwa & Janina Jędrzejczak-Gas, 2023. "Practical Implications of the Millennial Generation’s Consumer Behaviour in the Food Market," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Sanja Kovačić & Mihai Ciprian Mărgărint & Ruxandra Ionce & Đurđa Miljković, 2020. "What are the Factors affecting Tourist Behavior based on the Perception of Risk? Romanian and Serbian Tourists’ Perspective in the Aftermath of the recent Floods and Wildfires in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-22, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hamza Bahaji, 2011. "Incentives from stock option grants: a behavioral approach," Post-Print halshs-00681607, HAL.
    2. Jamie P. Monat, 2009. "The benefits of global scaling in multi-criteria decision analysis," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 4(6), pages 492-508, October.
    3. Putthiwanit, Chutinon & Vogler, Denis Marcel & Zhu, Jingling & Kincart, Andrew, 2011. "Exploring consumer’s insights in a unique Thai language course characteristics: the application of conjoint analysis technique," MPRA Paper 33589, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. John Board & Charles Sutcliffe, 2007. "Joined-Up Pensions Policy in the UK: An Asset-Liability Model for Simultaneously Determining the Asset Allocation and Contribution Rate," Economic Analysis, Institute of Economic Sciences, vol. 40(3-4), pages 87-118.
    5. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5246 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Maurer, Raimond & Mitchell, Olivia S. & Rogalla, Ralph, 2009. "Managing contribution and capital market risk in a funded public defined benefit plan: Impact of CVaR cost constraints," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 25-34, August.
    7. Fabrice Borel-Mathurin & Pierre-Emmanuel Darpeix & Quentin Guibert & Stéphane Loisel, 2018. "Main Determinants of Profit-Sharing Policy in the French Life Insurance Industry," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 43(3), pages 420-455, July.
    8. Ouidade Sabri & Van Doan Hai & Faten Malek & Hager Bachouche, 2019. "When Is Transparent Packaging Beneficial?," Working Papers 2019-006, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    9. Klaus G. Grunert & Yanfeng Zhou & Marija Banovic & Natascha Loebnitz, 2021. "Supermarket competence in emergent markets: Conceptualization, measurement, effects, and policy implications," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 1633-1659, December.
    10. Roschk, Holger & Müller, Jana & Gelbrich, Katja, 2013. "Age matters: How developmental stages of adulthood affect customer reaction to complaint handling efforts," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 154-164.
    11. Odunayo Magret Olarewaju & Mishelle Doorasamy & Titilayo Moromoke Oladejo, 2017. "Nexus of Working Capital Management and Firm Performance in Nigerian Food and Beverages Industries: A Link with Risk-Return Theory," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 9(1), pages 90-98.
    12. Ngwira, Bernard & Gerrard, Russell, 2007. "Stochastic pension fund control in the presence of Poisson jumps," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 283-292, March.
    13. Sheau-Fen, Yap & Sun-May, Leong & Yu-Ghee, Wee, 2012. "Store brand proneness: Effects of perceived risks, quality and familiarity," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 48-58.
    14. Catherine E. Althaus, 2005. "A Disciplinary Perspective on the Epistemological Status of Risk," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 567-588, June.
    15. repec:cup:judgdm:v:4:y:2009:i:6:p:492-508 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Juha Munnukka & Outi Uusitalo & Veera-Juulia Koivisto, 2017. "The consequences of perceived risk and objective knowledge for consumers’ investment behavior," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(4), pages 150-160, December.
    17. Cristian Trejos & Adrian van Deemen & Yeny E. Rodriguez & Juan M. Gomez, 2019. "Overconfidence and disposition effect in the stock market : A micro world based setting," Post-Print hal-02312273, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    consumer behaviour; perceived risk; purchasing decisions; Poland;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aic:journl:y:2011:v:58:p:281-304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sireteanu Napoleon-Alexandru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feaicro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.