IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/sojoae/29724.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Rents For Farmland And Timberland In A Subregion Of The South

Author

Listed:
  • Hardie, Ian W.

Abstract

This study compares equivalent annual rents for two alternative land uses in a region where farming and timber plantations coexist. The comparison is motivated by the possibility that rising timber prices may stimulate timber processors to compete for farmland. Prices, costs, and market rents are assumed to first follow existing trends and then to reach steady state values. Market rents are projected and capitalized for agriculture. Internal soil rents are capitalized for timber. The results show timber to have a comparative advantage on high fertility sites and suggest that timber might become a competitive land use at the intensive margin of the region's farmland base.

Suggested Citation

  • Hardie, Ian W., 1984. "Comparative Rents For Farmland And Timberland In A Subregion Of The South," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 16(2), pages 1-9, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:sojoae:29724
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.29724
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/29724/files/16020045.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.29724?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heaps, Terry & Neher, Philip A., 1979. "The economics of forestry when the rate of harvest is constrained," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 297-319, December.
    2. Richard W. Haynes & Darius M. Adams, 1983. "Changing Perceptions of the U.S. Forest Sector: Implications for the RPA Timber Assessment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(5), pages 1002-1009.
    3. K. E. McConnell & J. N. Daberkow & I. W. Hardie, 1983. "Planning Timber Production with Evolving Prices and Costs," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 59(3), pages 292-299.
    4. Hoffman, George & Gustafson, Cole, 1983. "A New Approach to Estimating Agricultural Costs of Production," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 35(4), pages 1-6, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Smith, S. Aaron & Popp, Michael P. & Nalley, Lawton Lanier & Brye, Kristofor R., 2012. "Modeling Pine as a Carbon-Sequestering Crop in Arkansas," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 41(2), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Harou, Patrice A. & Zheng, Chinlong & Zhang, Daowei, 2013. "The Alternative Test in forestry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 41-46.
    3. Hongkun Ma & Hao Zhu & Shuhan Ren & Rudi Liu & Cuixia Qiao, 2023. "The Impact of Government-Led Farmland Construction on Market-Oriented Farmland Transfer—Evidence from Shandong, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-12, February.
    4. Newman, D.H., 2002. "Forestry's golden rule and the development of the optimal forest rotation literature," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 5-27.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Newman, D.H., 2002. "Forestry's golden rule and the development of the optimal forest rotation literature," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 5-27.
    2. Gustafson, Cole R., 1986. "Measuring The Productivity Of Capital In United States Agriculture," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 18(2), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Duku-Kaakyire, Armstrong & Nanang, David M., 2004. "Application of real options theory to forestry investment analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(6), pages 539-552, October.
    4. Tahvonen, Olli & Salo, Seppo, 1999. "Optimal Forest Rotation within SituPreferences," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 106-128, January.
    5. Elizabeth A. Wilman & Mahen S. Mahendrarajah, 2002. "Carbon Offsets," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 78(3), pages 405-416.
    6. Fabbri, Giorgio & Faggian, Silvia & Freni, Giuseppe, 2015. "On the Mitra–Wan forest management problem in continuous time," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1001-1040.
    7. Terry Heaps, 2014. "Convergence of Optimal Harvesting Policies to a Normal Forest," Discussion Papers dp14-01, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.
    8. Skander BEN ABDALLAH & Pierre LASSERRE, 2015. "Optimum Forest Rotations of Alternative Tree Species," Cahiers de recherche 06-2015, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ.
    9. Gan, Jianbang & Kolison, Stephen H. & Colletti, Joe P., 2001. "Optimal forest stock and harvest with valuing non-timber benefits: a case of US coniferous forests," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 167-178, June.
    10. Farmer Karl & Bednar-Friedl Birgit, 2017. "Existence and Efficiency of Stationary States in a Renewable Resource Based OLG Model with Different Harvest Costs," Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Oeconomica, Sciendo, vol. 62(3), pages 3-32, December.
    11. G. F. Ortmann, 1987. "Land Rents and Production Costs in the South African Sugar Industry," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 55(3), pages 163-169, September.
    12. Lazarus, William F. & Selley, Roger A., 2001. "Suggested Procedures For Estimating Farm Machinery Costs For Extension Audiences," Staff Papers 14150, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    13. Stan Metcalfe, 2014. "George Shackle and The Schumpeterian Legacy," Graz Economics Papers 2014-08, University of Graz, Department of Economics.
    14. Zhang, Daowei, 2001. "Faustmann in an uncertain policy environment," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 203-210, June.
    15. Birgit Bednar-Friedl & Karl Farmer, 2013. "Time consuming resource extraction in an overlapping generations economy with capital," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 110(3), pages 203-224, November.
    16. Ben Abdallah, Skander & Lasserre, Pierre, 2017. "Forest land value and rotation with an alternative land use," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(PB), pages 118-127.
    17. Lazarus, William F. & Selley, Roger A., 2002. "Suggested Procedures For Estimating Farm Machinery Costs," Staff Papers 14072, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    18. Meie Deng & Anlu Zhang, 2020. "Market Efficiency under the Arrangement of Transaction Rules of the RCCL Market from the Supply-Side Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-16, September.
    19. Maria A. Cunha-e-Sa & Sofia F. Franco, 2013. "Forest management in an urbanizing landscape," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp580, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.
    20. Daniel W. Callaghan & Puskar N. Khanal & Thomas J. Straka & Donald L. Hagan, 2019. "Influence of Forestry Practices Cost on Financial Performance of Forestry Investments," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Land Economics/Use;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:sojoae:29724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.