IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ngjred/147902.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competitiveness of Cotton in Organic and Conventional Production Systems in Uganda

Author

Listed:
  • Elepu, Gabriel
  • Ekere, W.

Abstract

Organic cotton production in Uganda is rising mainly due to the promotional efforts of private multinational cotton exporting companies. Nonetheless, the sustainability of organic cotton projects and their ultimate impact on poverty reduction will depend on the relative profitability of organic cotton production system. This paper therefore attempts to examine the competitiveness of cotton in conventional and organic production systems in Uganda. A survey of 160 cotton farmers was done in Northern Uganda where organic cotton has been introduced. Using whole farm crop budgets and the linear programming method, it was found that cotton was competitive with other ‘cash’ crops only under organic production system mainly because of the existence of price premium. Gross returns to organic cotton were approximately 7%. In the absence of price premium, organic cotton was an unattractive enterprise since farmers made losses of over 13%. Policy recommendations were thus forwarded to promote organic cotton production in Uganda.

Suggested Citation

  • Elepu, Gabriel & Ekere, W., 2009. "Competitiveness of Cotton in Organic and Conventional Production Systems in Uganda," Journal of Rural Economics and Development, University of Ibadan, Department of Agricultural Economics, vol. 18, pages 1-13.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ngjred:147902
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.147902
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/147902/files/Elepu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.147902?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Baffes, 2009. "The 'Full Potential' of Uganda's Cotton Industry," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 27(1), pages 67-85, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vasilaky, Kathryn N. & Islam, Asif M., 2018. "Competition or cooperation? Using team and tournament incentives for learning among female farmers in rural Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 216-225.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ngjred:147902. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dauibng.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.