ITQ management programs can provide incentives to discard low valued fish so that individual quota can he used for relatively more valuable fish. Such "highgrading" can also occur where there are other constraints on harvest, such as hold capacity. This paper compares and contrasts the exact conditions under which highgrading will occur with ITQ and other harvest constraints. Considering all costs, highgrading can be efficient with physical constraints hut it is an unfortunate artifact of lTQs. Whether or not highgrading will occur depends upon the price differential between high and low valued fish, the cost of sorting and discarding and the cost of re-harvest. Policies for correcting or reducing ITQ highgrading should it occur, are described.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Matthew A. Turner, 1995.
"Value-based ITQ's,"
Working Papers
mturner-95-03, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions: