In the economic management of high-seas straddling fish stocks, we analyze the negotiation of a cooperative agreement by way of a characteristic function game (c-game). The benefits of a grand coalition may be distributed differently, depending on the negotiating members' harvesting efficiency and the concept of fairness chosen during negotiation. In the paper, we examine three such concepts: nucleolus, Shapley-value, and egalitarian. In general, a fleet's harvesting efficiency will determine the contribution it makes to any subcoalitions, or the grand coalition, in which it is the last to join. Analysis shows that the imputation to each member under each fairness concept differs according to whether the maximum, or the average, contribution is used, or whether the contribution can be regarded as bargaining power at all. By making certain assumptions regarding fleet efficiency, we calculated the exact imputation under each fairness concept and compared the change from one to another. Conclusions are then drawn with suggested further research.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)