IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlofdr/274577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Willingness to Pay a High-Premium for Organic Produce: An Econometric Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Govindasamy, Ramu
  • Arumugam, Surendran
  • Vellangany, Isaac
  • Ozkan, Burhan

Abstract

U.S. consumer demand for organically produced goods has grown continuously since the USDA established national standards for organic production and processing in 2002 (www.USDA.gov). Organic food sales have increased from approximately $11 billion in 2004 to an estimated $35.9 billion in 2015. As previous literature suggests, a large portion of consumers view organics favorably, but very few routinely choose to buy organic food over conventional food. It is assumed that this is due to—among other things— socioeconomic disparities. The objective of this paper is to predict the characteristics of consumers who are willing to pay high premiums for organic produce in the mid-Atlantic United States. In the context of this paper, a high premium is defined as at least 16% more for organic fruits and vegetables compared to conventional produce. Data were collected from 1,100 consumers using a private online survey company. A logit model was developed to predict which consumers are more likely to pay a high premium for organic produce. Results indicate that the overall model is highly significant, with a correct prediction rate of 71%. Those who have a graduate degree and an annual income above $100,000 are more likely to pay high premiums. Moreover, those who use food advertisements, certified organic labels, and natural labels to purchase produce are more likely to pay high premiums. Caucasians are more likely to pay high premiums, as are those who frequently buy at farm direct markets. As expected, consumers who think that organic food tastes better than conventional food and those who switch supermarkets to buy organic produce are more likely to pay high premiums. Those who want to buy organic jam, jelly, marmalade, juices, sauces, and dried chips are more likely to pay a high premium for organic produce. Those who regularly shop at more than one food store are less likely to pay a high premium. The model indicates that those who are influenced by the naturally grown label and prefer conventionally grown but local produce are less likely to pay high premiums. Those who consider buying organic food to be a waste of money are less likely to pay a high premium for organic fresh fruits and vegetables. Producers of organic vegetables and fruits can target customers with these specific traits to enhance their profitability.

Suggested Citation

  • Govindasamy, Ramu & Arumugam, Surendran & Vellangany, Isaac & Ozkan, Burhan, 2017. "Willingness to Pay a High-Premium for Organic Produce: An Econometric Analysis," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 48(1), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:274577
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.274577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/274577/files/JFDR_48.1_23_Govindasamy.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.274577?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Govindasamy, Ramu & Gao, Qun & Heckman, Joseph & Vellangany,Isaac & VanVranken, Richard, 2020. "Characteristics of Consumers Who Are Willing to Buy Certified Organic Produce: An Econometric Analysis," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 8(3), July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:274577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fdrssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.