IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlofdr/27424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis Of The Retail-Level Market Potential For Locally Grown Shiitake Mushrooms In North Alabama

Author

Listed:
  • Onianwa, Okwudili O.
  • Wesson, Betty
  • Wheelock, Gerald

Abstract

This study analyzed the market potential for locally grown shiitake mushrooms at the retail level in North Alabama. The data for this study were taken from a survey administered to produce managers of 79 retail stores in the region. Of the 79 stores in the sample, only 32 sold shiitake mushrooms. Results revealed that shiitake mushrooms were the third most retailed mushroom in North Alabama. Furthermore, supermarkets and specialty stores were more likely to stock shiitake mushrooms than were grocery stores. Among the shiitake types, fresh shiitake mushrooms were the most common, followed by packaged and dried forms, respectively. When sourcing for shiitake mushrooms, quality, freshness, and price were the three most important factors considered by produce managers.

Suggested Citation

  • Onianwa, Okwudili O. & Wesson, Betty & Wheelock, Gerald, 2000. "An Analysis Of The Retail-Level Market Potential For Locally Grown Shiitake Mushrooms In North Alabama," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 31(1), pages 1-10, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:27424
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.27424
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/27424/files/31010159.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.27424?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew P. Barkley & Barry L. Flinchbaugh, 1990. "Farm Operator Opinion and Agricultural Policy; Kansas Survey Results," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 12(2), pages 223-239.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wolf, Christopher A. & Tonsor, Glynn T., 2012. "Dairy Farmer Preferences for 2012 Farm Bill," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124866, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Reich, Denis Andrew, 2007. "Evaluating the Conservation Security Program utilizing the perceptions and economics of producer participation: implications for land stewardship in Iowa agriculture," ISU General Staff Papers 2007010108000016024, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    3. Keith H. Coble & Thomas O. Knight & George F. Patrick & Alan E. Baquet, 2002. "Understanding the Economic Factors Influencing Farm Policy Preferences," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 24(2), pages 309-321.
    4. Heo, Seong-Yoon & Kim, Sanghyo & Zulauf, Carl & Lee, Kye-Im, 2016. "Satisfaction with Food Policies for Consumer: A Case Study of South Korea," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 236145, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Kastens, Terry L. & Goodwin, Barry K., 1994. "An Analysis Of Farmers' Policy Attitudes And Preferences For Free Trade," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 26(2), pages 1-9, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:27424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fdrssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.