Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Using The Economist’s Big Mac Index for Instruction

Contents:

Author Info

  • Stegelin, Forrest E.
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    The Economist first launched the concept of the Big Mac Index in 1986 as a guide to whether currencies were at their correct exchange rate; it is not intended to be a precise predictor of currency movements around the globe, but simply a way to make exchange-rate theory and discussions a bit more digestible. First used as a humorous illustration, the term “burgernomics†was coined and the Big Mac index became an annual occurrence. It is based upon one of the oldest concepts in international economics – the theory of purchasing-power parity, which argues that the exchange rate between two currencies should in the long run move towards the rate that equalizes the prices of identical bundles of traded goods and services in each country. In other words, a dollar should buy the same amount everywhere. The reason the Big Mac Index is a better representation of world currencies is because McDonald’s Big Mac is made and distributed in over 120 countries on six continents. McDonald’s Big Mac is produced to more or less the same recipe in those countries, so the Big Mac Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) is an exchange rate that would leave hamburgers costing the same in each country, including the United States. The index can, however, be distorted by the local input costs and costs of transportation and distribution. An undergraduate course, Food and Fiber Marketing, in the Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics at the University of Georgia is attended by students enrolled in many other disciplines and colleges than the agricultural economics field. Trying to engage their different learning styles and experiences to develop interactions between the students and the instructor requires some imaginative activities. Since they all seem to enjoy eating fast food, even if not a Big Mac, using the concept of the hamburger as a common currency intrigues them. Comparing the Big Mac PPP with the actual rates signals if a currency is under- or over-valued, which provides an application to the exchange rate and trade discussions without worrying about fluctuating currency/exchange rates. For instance, after its massive currency devaluation a decade ago, Argentina had the cheapest Big Mac at 78¢, while Switzerland had the most expensive Big Mac at $3.81, against the average American price of $2.49; the Argentine peso was the most undervalued currency at the time and the Swiss franc the most overvalued

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/139458
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Food Distribution Research Society in its journal Journal of Food Distribution Research.

    Volume (Year): 43 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 1 (March)
    Pages:

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:139458

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://fdrs.ag.utk.edu/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: burgernomics; Big Mac Index; currency valuation; exchange rates; instruction; Financial Economics; International Relations/Trade; Political Economy;

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:139458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.