IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ecjilt/6320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Antidumping and Market Power in the Agriculture Sector, with a Special Case Study of the Fresh Tomato Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Baylis, Katherine R.
  • Malhotra, Nisha

Abstract

In this article we highlight the anticompetitive nature of antidumping (AD) legislation. Antidumping legislation was set up to protect domestic firms from predatory pricing by foreign firms. We argue that protecting highly concentrated industries drastically reduces competition at home. In cases where the industry consists only of one or two firms, import restriction may breed monopolies at the expense of domestic consumers. This article looks at cases filed by the agriculture sector, and at the market concentration of industries in this sector, to illustrate the above possibility. We study the case of fresh tomatoes in detail to further demonstrate the anticompetitive nature of AD legislation. We show the effect of AD legislation on imports, as well as the change in the Lerner index in the fresh tomato industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Baylis, Katherine R. & Malhotra, Nisha, 2008. "Antidumping and Market Power in the Agriculture Sector, with a Special Case Study of the Fresh Tomato Industry," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ecjilt:6320
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.6320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/6320/files/09010038.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.6320?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ecjilt:6320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esteyca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.