IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/148943.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality Safety Standards of Organic Mango

Author

Listed:
  • Lin, Kui
  • Wei, Riji
  • Zhang, Zheng
  • Huang, Zhaojun
  • Pan, Yankun
  • Huang, Daoping

Abstract

This article conducts a brief analysis of the factors that affect the quality safety of organic mango, and discusses the organic production measures for improving the quality and quality safety of mango, including the choice of environment of place of origin, varieties and seedlings, fertilizers and fertilization, plant protection products and other production inputs. A test is carried out in 0.667 hm2 of base in Tianyang County, Baise City.Content of lead,arsenic and 14 kinds of pesticide residue such as BHC in the mango are not detected; the content of heavy metal such as mercury and cadmium is 0.001-0.006 mg/kg. Then the quality and quality safety indicators of organic mango are discussed, and finally the Guangxi local standards of organic mango products are developed.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin, Kui & Wei, Riji & Zhang, Zheng & Huang, Zhaojun & Pan, Yankun & Huang, Daoping, 2013. "Quality Safety Standards of Organic Mango," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 5(04), pages 1-4, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:148943
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.148943
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/148943/files/32.PDF
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.148943?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:148943. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.