IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/121276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Vertical and Horizontal Comparison of Sustainable Development Status in Western China from the Perspective of Ecological Footprint

Author

Listed:
  • Du, Hui-ying
  • Dong, Hong-lin
  • Jin, Bo

Abstract

On the basis of ecological footprint theory, the ecological footprint and ecological carrying capacity of western China and 12 provinces and cities in 2009 are calculated. From the perspective of ecological footprint, the sustainable development status of west China and 12 provinces and cities in 2009 and 1999 are compared vertically and horizontally. Results assume that no matter weighting by using local or national ecological carrying capacity, the west area laid in the unsustainable development state in 2009; in 1999, the west area was on the unsustainable development stage taking the local and national level as the reference and it was at the sustainable stage at the global level. In 2009, most provinces in western China laid on the unsustainable stage at the local, national and global level. Compared with mat in 2009, few provinces in western China were on the unsustainable stage at different levels. In general, the sustainable developmental momentum of western China in 2009 was weaker man that in ten years ago and many provinces and cities decreased to unsustainable state.

Suggested Citation

  • Du, Hui-ying & Dong, Hong-lin & Jin, Bo, 2011. "A Vertical and Horizontal Comparison of Sustainable Development Status in Western China from the Perspective of Ecological Footprint," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 3(08), pages 1-5, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:121276
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.121276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/121276/files/06.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.121276?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:121276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.