IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aolpei/162303.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agricultural E-Government: Design of Quality Evaluation Method Based on ISO SQuaRE quality Model

Author

Listed:
  • Ulman, M.
  • Vostrovský, V.
  • Tyrychtr, J.

Abstract

The paper briefly describes the current use of e-government services in the Czech Republic with focus on use of e-services in agriculture. The term agricultural e-government is defined here. There are several methods for evaluation of service and e-service quality however, no relevant method based on ISO software quality standards was found yet. Proposed CABAG (Communication between Agricultural Businesses and Government) method enables to evaluate quality of agricultural electronic services by means of ISO/IEC 25010 quality in use model giving list of quality characteristics, sub characteristics and quality requirements. The overall quality of agricultural e-service is represented as an aggregated result of expected level minus actual level of implementation for each particular requirement. The method can be used both for end users and providers (or owners) of e-services. Pieces of knowledge introduced in this paper resulted from solution of Internal Grant Agency (IGA) of the Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague grant number 20131038 “Analýza a návrh modelu hodnocení kvality e-služeb v sektoru zemědělství” (Analysis and design of quality evaluation model of e-services in agriculture).

Suggested Citation

  • Ulman, M. & Vostrovský, V. & Tyrychtr, J., 2013. "Agricultural E-Government: Design of Quality Evaluation Method Based on ISO SQuaRE quality Model," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 5(4), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aolpei:162303
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.162303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/162303/files/agris_on-line_2013_4_ulman_vostrovsky_tyrychtr.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.162303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akinci, Serkan & Atilgan-Inan, Eda & Aksoy, Safak, 2010. "Re-assessment of E-S-Qual and E-RecS-Qual in a pure service setting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 232-240, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kubata, K. & Tyrychtr, J. & Ulman, M. & Vostrovský, V., 2014. "Business Informatics and its Role in Agriculture in the Czech Republic," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 6(2), pages 1-8, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ding, David Xin & Hu, Paul Jen-Hwa & Sheng, Olivia R. Liu, 2011. "e-SELFQUAL: A scale for measuring online self-service quality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 508-515, May.
    2. Jhalukpreya Surujlal & Ephrem Redda, 2015. "Customer perceptions of technology-based banking services:Influence of demographic variables," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 1003572, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    3. Prakash Singh & Lokesh Arora & Abdulaziz Choudhry, 2022. "Consumer Behavior in the Service Industry: An Integrative Literature Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-30, December.
    4. Ladhari, Riadh & Leclerc, André, 2013. "Building loyalty with online financial services customers: Is there a gender difference?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 560-569.
    5. Mohd Naved Khan & Neha Gupta & Manita Matharu & Mohammad Faisal Khan, 2023. "Sustainable E-Service Quality in Tourism: Drivers Evaluation Using AHP-TOPSIS Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, May.
    6. Llach, Josep & Marimon, Frederic & Alonso-Almeida, María del Mar & Bernardo, Merce, 2013. "Determinants of online booking loyalties for the purchasing of airline tickets," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 23-31.
    7. Tzu-En Lu & Yi-Hsuan Lee & Jer-Wei Hsu, 2020. "Does Service Recovery Really Work? The Multilevel Effects of Online Service Recovery Based on Brand Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, August.
    8. Hamzah, Zalfa Laili & Syed Alwi, Sharifah Faridah & Othman, Md Nor, 2014. "Designing corporate brand experience in an online context: A qualitative insight," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2299-2310.
    9. Yaya Luc Honore Petnji & Marimon Frederic & Fa Marti Casadesus, 2012. "Measuring E-Service Quality: Reviewing E-S-QUAL," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 27(1), pages 19-41, September.
    10. Gonçalves, Helena Milagre Martins, 2013. "Multi-group invariance in a third-order factorial model: Attribute satisfaction measurement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1292-1297.
    11. Che Nawi Noorshella & Al Mamun Abdullah & Ahmad Raston Nursalihah, 2015. "Examining the Key Factors Affecting e-Service Quality of Small Online Apparel Businesses in Malaysia," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, April.
    12. Su-Young Kwak & Woo-Sung Cho & Gil-Am Seok & Seung-Gyun Yoo, 2020. "Intention to Use Sustainable Green Logistics Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aolpei:162303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fevszcz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.