IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/acagov/54039.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Problems of milk quota management in accounting system their effect on property status of enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Kiss, Arpad

Abstract

According to both international and Hungarian accounting standards milk quota shall be capitalised among the assets of the enterprises. It is necessary for the implementation of the activity; its value can be defined based on market processes and regulations of the authorities. Due to the possibility of trading quotas on the market it would be the only solution to avoid the recognition of requested and purchased quotas on different values in the accounting system. Considering the total amount of quotas a HUF 40 billion increase of assets could be reached by the enterprises in milk production, if quotas were recognized among the intangible assets. Based on the results of a questionnaire survey the majority of enterprises did not perform the valuation tasks, therefore the total asset value is lower than the realistic value by HUF 50 million (by 7.2% of the total asset value). The study introduces the possible methods of the calculation of historical cost and depreciation.

Suggested Citation

  • Kiss, Arpad, 2009. "Problems of milk quota management in accounting system their effect on property status of enterprises," Acta Agronomica Ovariensis, University of West Hungary, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, vol. 51(1), pages 1-9.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:acagov:54039
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.54039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/54039/files/Acta-51-1-separat-Kiss.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.54039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:acagov:54039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ginymhu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.