IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/agr/journl/v11(516)(supplement)(vol2)y2007i11(516)(supplement)(vol2)p219-228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contemporary Fiscal Policy Under The Incidence Of The New Paradigm Of Economics, Theoretical-Methodological Pluralism

Author

Listed:
  • Niţă Dobrotă

    (Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest)

  • Cornel Ionescu

    (Spiru Haret University, Bucharest)

Abstract

Throughout centuries, economic schools and streams of thinking have dealt with economic problems, the problem of fiscality, of budget expenses and budget deficit in various individualist manners. In the last few decades, these issues have become so complex and dynamic, that none of the existing streams alone is capable of covering them. From a limited approach in point of space and time, the analysis of fiscal policy and especially the analysis of the state budget deficit may be reduced to studying the benefic and/or malefic interdependencies between Romania's fiscal policy and the dynamics of its national economy. In order to perform this operation, at present, it is necessary to thoroughly delimit the specific concepts, and at the same time, to specify the view and adequate tools (to the historical stage) that highlight the interdependencies between the reflected processes. Interdependencies concern both the senses of evolution and those expressing the qualitative sides of the respective processes. We will further study and analyze all these multiple interdependencies of growth, development and modernization of economy on the one hand, and fiscal policy as well as budget deficit on the other, in the spirit of theoretical pluralism, or, in other words, of a scientific theory. "We live in a period in which the specialists in macroeconomics issue new hypotheses in connection with the mechanisms governing economy – E. Phelps observedand try to find a new paradigm. Pluralism is the best methodological solution, its periodical manifestations being impossible to avoid anyway." Anticipating, we specify that in case of fiscal policy, the pluralist approach refers to a certain joining of principles and rules that are at the basis of aggregate demand and aggregate supply. At present, the supporters of the supply theory are in an obvious offensive position. They define their conception by the requirement of "supply oriented tax reduction". More concretely, the respective conception is outlined by three exigencies: (a) Fiscal reforms should contribute to increasing the stimuli by reducing taxes on the last currency unit of income, and by reducing marginal taxes, respectively. (b) Taxation fiscal system should be less progressive, which means reduction of the tax burdens imposed on the persons with high income. We are speaking about applying the theory of Laffer's Curve, which says that high and progressive taxes may lead to reduction of state fiscal incomes. (c) The respective system should be conceived in such a way as to stimulate productivity and supply, not to manipulate aggregate demand. It follows from above that pluralism implies a new relation between the theory of aggregate supply and demand when substantiating fiscal policy and not giving up the theory of Keynesian and Neo- Keynesian extraction.

Suggested Citation

  • Niţă Dobrotă & Cornel Ionescu, 2007. "Contemporary Fiscal Policy Under The Incidence Of The New Paradigm Of Economics, Theoretical-Methodological Pluralism," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 11(11(516)(s), pages 219-228, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:11(516)(supplement)(vol2):y:2007:i:11(516)(supplement)(vol2):p:219-228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ectap.ro/documente/suplimente/simpozion_23_nov_2007_en_vol2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:11(516)(supplement)(vol2):y:2007:i:11(516)(supplement)(vol2):p:219-228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marin Dinu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/agerrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.