This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

The devil is in the details: assessing early industrial performance across international borders using late nineteenth century North American manufacturers as a case study

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Kris Inwood () (Department of Economics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada)
Ian Keay () (Department of Economics, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Was the average late nineteenth century Canadian manufacturer a hopelessly inefficient laggard when compared to his American counterparts just on the other side of the international border? Could it have been that Canadian producers were really productivity leaders so early in their industrialization process? To answer these fundamental questions about the performance of a small open economy at a key juncture in its industrial development we need a quantitative comparison of Canadian relative to US productivity. Unfortunately, the approach we adopt with respect to data compilation, methodological choice, and the identification of inputs, outputs, input weights, and prices has both quantitative and qualitative effects on any performance assessment we may undertake. To illustrate the severity of these effects we use manuscript census data from 1870/1871 to derive a series of total factor productivity (TFP) comparisons for a sample of manufacturing establishments located immediately to the north and south of the Canada–US border. Even with some of the most common and defensible variable definitions, we find dramatic differences between the most optimistic and most pessimistic assessments of late nineteenth century Canadian performance. Our case study suggests to us that those interested in the assessment of long run performance differentials should appreciate the sensitivity of these assessments and they should carefully consider the approach that has been taken toward data preparation, methodological choice, and variable definitions in their construction.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.springerlink.com/content/g348238x8143/?p=fd725a7e00bb42e1bcf437fe16f1d842&pi=0
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to journal subscribers

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC) in its journal Cliometrica, Journal of Historical Economics and Econometric History.

Volume (Year): 2 (2008)
Issue (Month): 2 (July)
Pages: 85-117
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:afc:cliome:v:2:y:2008:i:2:p:85-117

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.cliometrie.org
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Karine Pellier).

Related research
Keywords: Canada Comparative Manufacturing Methodology Productivity United States

Find related papers by JEL classification:
D2 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations
L6 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing
N6 - Economic History - - Manufacturing and Construction

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Authors registered on the RePEc Author Service receive monthly emails with details about downloads and abstract views of their works.

This page was last updated on 2008-11-22.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.