IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/infoec/v16y2012i3p5-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Modeling Qualities, Tones and Gages in Ceramic Supply Chains' Master Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Isabel MUNDI
  • Ma Mar Eva ALEMANY
  • Andres BOZA
  • Raul POLER

Abstract

Ceramic production processes are characterized by providing quantities of the same finished goods that differ in qualities, tones and gages. This aspect becomes a problem for ceramic supply chains (SCs) that should promise and serve customer orders with homogeneous quantities of the same finished good. In this paper a mathematical programming model for the centralized master planning of ceramic SC is proposed. Inputs to the master plan include demand forecasts in terms of customer order classes based on their order size and splitting percentages of a lot into homogeneous sub-lots. Then, the master plan defines the size and loading of lots to production lines and their distribution with the aim of maximizing the number of customer orders fulfilled with homogeneous quantities in the most efficient manner for the SC. Finally, the effect of modeling qualities, tones and gages in master planning is assessed.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabel MUNDI & Ma Mar Eva ALEMANY & Andres BOZA & Raul POLER, 2012. "The Effect of Modeling Qualities, Tones and Gages in Ceramic Supply Chains' Master Planning," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(3), pages 5-18.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:infoec:v:16:y:2012:i:3:p:5-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.revistaie.ase.ro/content/63/01%20-%20Mundi,%20Alemany.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ozdamar, Linet & Birbil, Sevket Ilker, 1998. "Hybrid heuristics for the capacitated lot sizing and loading problem with setup times and overtime decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(3), pages 525-547, November.
    2. Meyr, H., 2009. "Customer Segmentation, Allocation Planning and Order Promising in Make-to-Stock Production," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 36061, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Folarin B. Oyebolu & Jeroen Lidth de Jeude & Cyrus Siganporia & Suzanne S. Farid & Richard Allmendinger & Juergen Branke, 2017. "A new lot sizing and scheduling heuristic for multi-site biopharmaceutical production," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 231-256, August.
    2. Raf Jans, 2009. "Solving Lot-Sizing Problems on Parallel Identical Machines Using Symmetry-Breaking Constraints," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 123-136, February.
    3. Seitz, Alexander & Grunow, Martin & Akkerman, Renzo, 2020. "Data driven supply allocation to individual customers considering forecast bias," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    4. Konstantin Kloos & Richard Pibernik & Benedikt Schulte, 2019. "Allocation planning in sales hierarchies with stochastic demand and service-level targets," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(4), pages 981-1024, December.
    5. Ozdamar, Linet & Barbarosoglu, Gulay, 2000. "An integrated Lagrangean relaxation-simulated annealing approach to the multi-level multi-item capacitated lot sizing problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 319-331, December.
    6. Quante, R. & Fleischmann, M. & Meyr, H., 2009. "A Stochastic Dynamic Programming Approach to Revenue Management in a Make-to-Stock Production System," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2009-015-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    7. Jans, R.F., 2006. "Solving Lotsizing Problems on Parallel Identical Machines Using Symmetry Breaking Constraints," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2006-051-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    8. Jans, Raf & Degraeve, Zeger, 2007. "Meta-heuristics for dynamic lot sizing: A review and comparison of solution approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1855-1875, March.
    9. Waßmuth, Katrin & Köhler, Charlotte & Agatz, Niels & Fleischmann, Moritz, 2023. "Demand management for attended home delivery—A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(3), pages 801-815.
    10. Absi, Nabil & Kedad-Sidhoum, Safia, 2008. "The multi-item capacitated lot-sizing problem with setup times and shortage costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(3), pages 1351-1374, March.
    11. Petering, Matthew E.H. & Chen, Xi & Hsieh, Wen-Huan, 2019. "Inventory control with flexible demand: Cyclic case with multiple batch supply and demand processes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 60-77.
    12. Ben Ali, M. & D’Amours, S. & Gaudreault, J. & Carle, M-A., 2018. "Configuration and evaluation of an integrated demand management process using a space-filling design and Kriging metamodeling," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 45-58.
    13. Taş, Duygu & Gendreau, Michel & Jabali, Ola & Jans, Raf, 2019. "A capacitated lot sizing problem with stochastic setup times and overtime," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 146-159.
    14. Diego Fiorotto & Silvio Araujo, 2014. "Reformulation and a Lagrangian heuristic for lot sizing problem on parallel machines," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 217(1), pages 213-231, June.
    15. Gnoni, M. G. & Iavagnilio, R. & Mossa, G. & Mummolo, G. & Di Leva, A., 2003. "Production planning of a multi-site manufacturing system by hybrid modelling: A case study from the automotive industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 251-262, August.
    16. Yasemin Merzifonluoğlu & Joseph Geunes & H.E. Romeijn, 2007. "Integrated capacity, demand, and production planning with subcontracting and overtime options," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(4), pages 433-447, June.
    17. Ojha, Divesh & Sahin, Funda & Shockley, Jeff & Sridharan, Sri V., 2019. "Is there a performance tradeoff in managing order fulfillment and the bullwhip effect in supply chains? The role of information sharing and information type," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 529-543.
    18. Vogel, Sebastian & Meyr, Herbert, 2015. "Decentral allocation planning in multi-stage customer hierarchies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 462-470.
    19. Fleischmann, Moritz & Kloos, Konstantin & Nouri, Maryam & Pibernik, Richard, 2020. "Single-period stochastic demand fulfillment in customer hierarchies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(1), pages 250-266.
    20. Raul Oltra-Badenes & Hermenegildo Gil-Gomez & Jose M Merigo & Daniel Palacios-Marques, 2019. "Methodology and model-based DSS to managing the reallocation of inventory to orders in LHP situations. Application to the ceramics sector," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:infoec:v:16:y:2012:i:3:p:5-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Paul Pocatilu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.