This file is part of IDEAS , which uses RePEc data
[ Papers |
Articles |
Software |
Books |
Chapters |
Authors |
Institutions |
JEL Classification |
NEP reports |
Search |
New papers by email |
Author registration |
Rankings |
Volunteers |
FAQ |
Blog |
Help! ]
Experiments with a Decentralized Mechanism for Public Good Decisions Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics Smith, Vernon L
Additional information is available for the following
registered author(s):
No abstract is available for
this item.
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page . Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Article provided by American Economic Association in its journal American Economic Review .
Volume (Year): 70 (1980)
Issue (Month): 4 (September)
Pages: 584-99
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract ),
plain text
(with abstract ),
BibTeX ,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:70:y:1980:i:4:p:584-99Contact details of provider: Email: Web page: http://www.aeaweb.org/aer/ More information through EDIRC
Order Information: Web: http://www.aeaweb.org/subscribe.html
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Keywords: Cited by : (explanations , Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile , click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Runge, C. Ford, 1985.
"The Assurance Problem And Conjectural Variation In Public Goods Provision ,"
Staff Papers
13548, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
[Downloadable!]
Jason Shogren & Thomas Crocker, 1991.
"Cooperative and noncooperative protection against transferable and filterable externalities ,"
Environmental & Resource Economics ,
European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 1(2), pages 195-214, June.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Stephen Johnson & Laurence J. Kotlikoff & William Samuelson, 1987.
"Can People Compute? An Experimental Test of the Life Cycle Consumption Model ,"
NBER Working Papers
2183, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Sean Gailmard & Thomas R. Palfrey, 2002.
"An Experimental Comparison of Collective Choice Procedures for Excludable Public Goods ,"
Working Papers
0214, Harris School of Public Policy Studies, University of Chicago.
[Downloadable!]
Jason F. Shogren, 1990.
"Impact of Self-Protection and Self-Insurance on Individual Response to Risk, The ,"
Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications
90-wp53, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
[Downloadable!]
Van Essen, Matthew J., 2008.
"A Simple Supermodular Mechanism that Implements Lindahl Allocations ,"
MPRA Paper
12781, University Library of Munich, Germany.
[Downloadable!]
Josef Falkinger & Ernst Fehr & Simon Gaechter, .
"A Simple Mechanism for the Efficient Provision of Public Goods - Experimental Evidence ,"
IEW - Working Papers
iewwp003, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - IEW.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions: Steffen Ziss, 1996.
"Public good provision and the Smith Process ,"
Review of Economic Design ,
Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 245-261, December.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Bennett, J.W. & Carter, M., 1993.
"Prospects For Contingent Valuation: Lessons From The South-East Forests ,"
Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics ,
Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 37(02), August.
[Downloadable!]
Randall, Alan, 1982.
"Economic Surplus Concepts and Their Use in Benefit Cost Analysis ,"
Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics ,
Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(02), August.
[Downloadable!]
Ken Willis & Guy Garrod, 1991.
"Valuing Open Access Recreation on Inland Waterways: On-site Recreation Surveys and Selection Effects ,"
Regional Studies ,
Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 511-524, December.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
David Perez-Castrillo & Robert F. Veszteg, 2005.
"Experimental Evidence on the Multibidding Mechanism ,"
UFAE and IAE Working Papers
638.05, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
[Downloadable!]
Sven Fischer & Andreas Nicklisch, 2006.
"Ex Interim Voting in Public Good Provision ,"
Papers on Strategic Interaction
2006-13, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group.
[Downloadable!]
Michael A. Spencer & Stephen K. Swallow & Jason F. Shogren & John A. List, 2008.
"Rebate Rules in Threshold Public Good Provision ,"
NBER Working Papers
14559, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Spencer, Michael A. & Swallow, Stephen K. & Shogren, Jason F. & List, John A., 2009.
"Rebate rules in threshold public good provision ,"
Journal of Public Economics ,
Elsevier, vol. 93(5-6), pages 798-806, June.
[Downloadable!] (restricted) Glenn W. Harrison, 2005.
"Field Experiments and Control ,"
Artefactual Field Experiments
0049, The Field Experiments Website.
[Downloadable!]
Roumasset , James, 1989.
"Decentralization and local public goods: getting the incentives right ,"
MPRA Paper
17111, University Library of Munich, Germany.
[Downloadable!]
Access and
download statistics Did you know? The RePEc project started in 1997. Its precursor, NetEc, dates back to 1993.
This page was last updated on 2009-11-16.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics , College of Liberal Arts and Sciences , University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics .