This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Explaining the Relative Efficiency of Slave Agriculture in the Antebellum South

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Fogel, Robert W
Engerman, Stanley L

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-8282%28197706%2967%3A3%3C275%3AETREOS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-7&origin=repec
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: full text
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by American Economic Association in its journal American Economic Review.

Volume (Year): 67 (1977)
Issue (Month): 3 (June)
Pages: 275-96
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:67:y:1977:i:3:p:275-96

Contact details of provider:
Email:
Web page: http://www.aeaweb.org/aer/
More information through EDIRC

Order Information:
Web: http://www.aeaweb.org/subscribe.html

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Haluk Ergin & Serdar Sayan, 1997. "A Microeconomic Analysis of Slavery in Comparison to Free Labor Economies," Departmental Working Papers 978, Bilkent University, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  2. Nils-Petter Lagerlof, 2002. "The Roads To and From Serfdom," Macroeconomics 0212011, EconWPA. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  3. Robert A. Margo, 2002. "The North-South Wage Gap, Before and After the Civil War," NBER Working Papers 8778, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Alan L. Olmstead & Paul W. Rhode, 2008. "Biological Innovation and Productivity Growth in the Antebellum Cotton Economy," NBER Working Papers 14142, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  5. Claudia Goldin, 1994. "Cliometrics and the Nobel," NBER Historical Working Papers 0065, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  6. Robert A. Margo, 2004. "Ideology, Government, and the American Dilemma," Working Papers 0411, Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, revised May 2004. [Downloadable!]
  7. Kenneth L. Sokoloff & Viken Tchakerian, 1997. "Manufacturing Where Agriculture Predominates: Evidence from the South and Midwest in 1860," NBER Historical Working Papers 0100, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS also computes impact factors for journals and working paper series.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-16.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.