IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adr/anecst/y1999i55-56p129-152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sample Attrition in Panel Data: The Role of Selection on Observables

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Moffitt
  • John Fitzgerald
  • Peter Gottschalk

Abstract

The traditional formulation of the attrition problem in econometrics treats it as a special case of the partial-population section bias model in which selection (attrition) is based on model unobservables. This paper considers instead the treatment of attrition as a special case of selection on observables. The analysis compares and contrasts the identification assumptions and estimation procedures for this case with those of the usual case of selection on unobservables. Selection on observables case has rarely been considered in the econometric literature on the problem and hence the framing of the problem in these terms, as presented here, is apparently new. The selection on observables problem is made nontrivial by the assumption that selection occurs on endogenous observables; leading examples are lagged dependent variables from earlier periods in the panel. Among other things, it is shown in the paper that (i) weighted least squares using estimated attrition equations to construct the weights is one method of consistent estimation in thise case; (ii) simply conditioning on the observables does not, by itself, generate consistent estimates; and (iii) that the model is closely related to the choice-based sampling model.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Moffitt & John Fitzgerald & Peter Gottschalk, 1999. "Sample Attrition in Panel Data: The Role of Selection on Observables," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 55-56, pages 129-152.
  • Handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:1999:i:55-56:p:129-152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20076194
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:1999:i:55-56:p:129-152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Secretariat General or Laurent Linnemer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ensaefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.